somewhere-in-the-dungeon:
#it’s called greed at the expense of others#pokemon#silly things#ignore me#I count anyone looking to exterminate a bunch of pokemon as a villain#I mean they must be sentient right? you can’t exterminate sentient creatures that’s not cool
That’s a really important question I never got a solid answer to. Are pokemon sentient?
In a sense, that’s a bad question. Alakazam is the canonical smartest pokemon I’m aware of, but its description is a pretty clearcut case of writers can’t do math. Its pokedex entry says that its IQ floats around 5k. That’s wrong on multiple levels; IQ is designed around percentiles with 100 as the median and a standard deviation of 15. For those who aren’t statistics nerds, that means that about two thirds of everyone tested fall between 85 and 115. About 5% of the population is going to have an IQ above 125, dropping rapidly the further away from the centre of the bell curve you go. An IQ of 5k is well over three hundred standard deviations above the mean. That’s not a measurement, that’s an instrument error. (For an idea of what that looks like, the standard deviation of adult male height is about 3 inches. Someone three hundred standard deviations taller than average would be over eighty feet tall; basically the scale starts doing screwy things once you get more than five standard deviations off, and your prior on data more than ten standard deviations away is either operator error or act of god.)
How intelligent are pokemon? (Ignoring alakazam and legendaries.) Some of them use tools, and most communicate in some kind of language. (It’s been a while- does anyone know if they can communicate abstractions?) It seems like they need supervision when working on complex tasks, though that might just be that we mostly see pokemon when they’re around humans. I don’t remember examples of abstract reasoning or problem solving without human direction, but again it’s been a while. Are they like dogs who get taught new tricks, or like chimpanzees who learn new skills? From what I remember, I’d peg most of them around the IQ 30 range? (Just under the usual lineup of chimps, grey parrots, and dolphins.) I’m not very confident in that number though.
Digression aside (look, I was in a bunch of psychology experiments right around when I was getting into pokemon and the alakazam thing has been bugging me for decades) intelligence isn’t really the same thing as sentience, and sentience isn’t necessarily the same as self-awareness, but they are kinda in the same ballpark. (And the definition of sentience is a little different than how people tend to use the word in scifi-ish settings.) Something is sentient if it has qualia, that is, it experiences sensations. Pokemon certainly seem like they experience things- they retreat from pain, enjoy good food, and can even remember things for longer periods. So, most pokemon are at least on the level of a chicken. That said, chicken is tasty. Even the vegetarians I know don’t seem to think chickens need the same level of rights we apply to humans- they don’t get to vote or hold property, and it’s unclear what freedom of speech for chickens would even mean.
Do pokemon have a sense of self? An understanding that there is me, there are others, and a concept that we are the same but different. (Example: I’m hungry right now, but I understand that you might not be hungry and that you have other goals than my hunger. Very young children don’t really have this yet, and a lot of animals don’t seem to do this, instead reacting to the world as though they were the only ones with goals.) Pikachu clearly recognizes Ash, and acts to manipulate or communicate with him. Pikachu also easily distinguishes between multiple humans, using different strategies to deal with them. Pikachu seems to co-operate with Ash’s goals, though it’s kind of unclear if Pikachu’s goal is something like “Make Ash do the smiling thing and give me treats” which wouldn’t really be understanding Ash as an agent in his own right.
The key point here is probably that the term “pokemon” is a catchall, used similar to our “mammal” and therefore encompassing a wide range of intellect and moral weight. Cows, chimps, and humans are all mammals, but the ethics around these categories are different. Even assuming it wasn’t an endangered species, eating Lugia is clearly immoral. On the other hand, rattata is portrayed as being about on par with rats in terms of mental faculties. I’d eat a rat, so I’d probably eat a rattata.
Actually there seems to be a simple, if inconsistent, answer to your question.
In the episode: Island of the Giant Pokemon; Pikachu, Squirtle, Bulbasaur, and Charmander are separated from Ash. Pikachu, being the online outside of a pokeball, releases the other three and they head out on a journey to find him.
On the way we discover that Meowth (who is capable of human speech), Ekans, and Koffing have also become separated from their trainers and are similarly looking. Upon finding Pikachu and pals, however, Meowth immediately makes a decision to try and capture Pikachu since he has the opportunity. Ekans and Koffing decline as Meowth is not their ‘master’. The following conversation takes place:
Meowth: Masters? I’m twice as smart as those 2-watt lightbulbs you’re calling masters
Ekans: Master is master!
Koffing: Yes, yes.
Meowth: Come on, we’re all bad guys here. We don’t need masters to tell us to go and do bad stuff.
Ekans: Pokemon not bad guys!
Koffing: That’s right.
Meowth: There’s no such thing as a bad pokemon?
Ekans: Pokemon do bad things because Master bad.
Meowth: It can’t be! My master’s not around and I always seem to act like a rat!
A later conversation reveals that Bulbasaur is sure Ashe and Co. abandoned them which upsets Ekans and Koffing leaving Pikachu and Charmander to calm everyone down.
While there seems to be a sense of dependency here, I think these scenes where the pokemon are left on their own really help to shape them as intelligent creatures with a defined sense of self.
This episode is a gold mine for this. Later episodes such as Dig those Diglett, where trainer owned pokemon who have never even met the Diglett who are in trouble decline to battle them also seem to make a good argument?
In Tentacool and Tentacruel, Tentacruel takes psychic control of Meowth and uses his ability to speak the human language to communicate the issues the jellyfish pokemon have with the people and Misty is able to talk it down (much like one would talk down a hostage situation).
I’m happy to provide more examples or counter examples but you must remember I need things explained to me like I’m 6 in order to understand them and you used too many big words.